Hair again. Compare and contrast.
Jun. 17th, 2004 06:05 pmTaking a page from
kenshi's book when he faced the important "To chop or not to chop" decision...
Clearly this question requires photographic evidence and the elicitation of short essays. A poll isn't very useful: I want to read your actual reasoning. So, look under the cut at the photos, and tell me: long hair (French-twisted), or short-n-sassy? And why do you say so?
Thank you.
Long hair, wrapped up, from back:

Long hair, wrapped up, from front: (one of those "Here's me five minutes ago, holding out the digital camera" poses)

Short hair from front:

(Couldn't find any of short hair from back.)
Clearly this question requires photographic evidence and the elicitation of short essays. A poll isn't very useful: I want to read your actual reasoning. So, look under the cut at the photos, and tell me: long hair (French-twisted), or short-n-sassy? And why do you say so?
Thank you.
Long hair, wrapped up, from back:

Long hair, wrapped up, from front: (one of those "Here's me five minutes ago, holding out the digital camera" poses)

Short hair from front:

(Couldn't find any of short hair from back.)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 06:59 pm (UTC)It is hard to say, you should post pics of both the front and the back of both styles. I am only half saying that to get you post more pictures. Xenedra is right on saying you have a lovely neckline, but both styles show it off. Hmmm. Yeah, I need more pictures before I can decide.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 08:19 pm (UTC)OK, I added one more pic from about ten minutes ago, of the twist from the front. Couldn't find any of the short hair from the back, since that isn't a common photo pose.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-18 05:45 am (UTC)Yes, now that I see it I think the french twist/long hair is the way to go.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 07:16 pm (UTC)I say this because I went short and sassy and people kept calling me "sir" so now I've been growing my hair out for...two years in September. And it's only just now long enough to pull all of it up or French braid it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 05:18 pm (UTC)Hehe...yeah, when I went super-short (like Hugh Grant's floppy hairstyle) a number of years back, someone was heard to say, upon looking at my photo, "Who's the cute guy?" Well, at least I was a *cute* guy, I guess....
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 08:15 pm (UTC)1) when it's up like that, it looks very nice yet is still professional. And if any formal events come along, it can be made to look very elegant.
2) you can still wear it down when you want to
3) I think the longer hair will be generally more versatile. It leaves you more options as far as style goes depending on your mood. When it's short, there's only so much that can be done with it.
That wasn't really an essay, but hopefully I've explained my rationale reasonably well. Short is definitely cute, but long still takes it in my opinion.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 08:22 pm (UTC)If I may (from someone who you don't know...), I vote for the short/sassy. I say this because you have the face to pull off both looks and a French braid, day in and day out...well, hell, that's f'n time consuming and it's the same look, every day, you can't really vary it. At least with a short/shoulder length "do" it can look professional and somewhat varied from day to day, as you style it a bit differently.
Just my $1.98.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 09:18 pm (UTC)If it were me, though, I'd go with the French twist. Assuming I knew how to do a French twist. Which I don't. (I am a sad excuse for a girl.) ^_^;;
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 09:47 pm (UTC)Or you could always get it cornrowed if you want to go all 80s Bo Derek... ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-18 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-18 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 07:26 am (UTC)April
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 11:17 am (UTC)Just an observation that your ears in the second picture look amazingly Elvish.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 05:22 pm (UTC)Ahh, yes, I've gone that short before, from nearly that long, and I loved how easy it was to take care of. I'm always tempted by that. Maybe this time I'll give slightly long hair a chance, but someday I bet I'll go back to short...
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 03:32 pm (UTC)My only problem with long hair (on either of us) is that we end up looking a bit too granola for our own good... like hippied-out-of-work ceramics teachers. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 05:27 pm (UTC)This time I'm going to have lots more layers than I've had before with the long hair, so hopefully it will allow for some waviness (or a supermodel-mane, if possible) that I didn't get with the all-one-length-with-bangs thing I used to have, back in the days.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-21 09:48 am (UTC)I'm with you on the shameless vanity thing: my hair is nearly one length and about an inch or two above my bra strap in the back and still growing, so I'm debating how much texture to give it when I get my next cut.... >_
Buria
Date: 2004-07-08 09:32 am (UTC)Buria
Date: 2004-07-08 10:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 11:47 am (UTC)I'd say the short, but from idealogical grounds. (I get a haircut when I have to, and have them take a lot off so it will be a while before I have to go again.) The French twist does look more sophisticated, but both styles (I'm being terribly lookist here) emphasize your neckline and the delicacy of your face.
Thus, the response from a perfect stranger. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 01:02 pm (UTC)And I must admit the short is less trouble, and in some ways I like it more. Then other times I like having the long mane, so the "Which do you like?" question is the difficult one.
However, I suspect I'll lose my patience with the long hair one of these months, and tell them to take off six inches. It's been the cycle so far.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 01:04 pm (UTC)