Jazz, schmazz.
Mar. 10th, 2003 07:02 pmAll right, I admit it: I'm just using this entry as an excuse to admire my new icon. Aren't they precious? Don't you think Sean and 'Lijah should consider the Goth look? (Also it amuses me because it looks strangely like an album cover by the Cure, circa 1982. "Angssty Hobbitses," the follow-up EP to "17 Seconds"...) (Sean's not quite as chubby as Robert Smith, though.)
So. 'Chicago' was the big winner at the S.A.G. awards last night. I keep thinking I should see it, because I liked 'Moulin Rouge' and it looks sort of similar, but I can't get excited about it. Deep down I know it's different. 'Moulin Rouge' was a big grandiose mix of music styles, all of them over-the-top romantic; the whole thing was bursting at the seams with...well...freedom, beauty, truth, and love, as they claimed. Despite my cynical exterior I have an alarmingly soft spot for plush, gorgeous romanticism. Meanwhile, 'Chicago' looks sort of hard and snobbish and sophisticated. And, more to the point, I don't like jazz. I mean, I REALLY don't like it. That would surely spoil my enjoyment of 'Chicago' just a tad.
In fact, I'd like to take this space to quote a monologue Bruce McCullough once performed on "Kids in the Hall." In Bruce's usual easygoing way, he said it best:
People say, "What do you hate about poor old Jazz?"
I say, "The sound. The sound that Jazz instruments make when they're being manipulated by Jazz players to the delight of Jazz respondents. I think of it as musical barf."
They say, "I don't think you've given Jazz a chance."
Well, I maintain, I haven't given suicide a chance, but... Well, I did give suicide a chance, but that was only because I was threatened with Jazz. You know. Jazz music.
One thing I hate is being woken up in the middle of the night, when I'm dreaming about, say, promiscuity with dignity, by a rap-tap-tappin' on my window by those guys with goatee things on their faces, saying, "Hey. Can we come in? Beano's clarinet's gettin' wet." And then they go into this sorta Gene Krupa trance. Jazz, schmazz. I'm sorry; I've got to go that far. Jazz, schmazz.
True, I haven't actually seen 'Chicago.' My little sister spent twenty minutes telling me the whole plot, though. I figure that's enough. Give me back my pretty soft-hearted boys in white shirts, and keep your jazz.
So. 'Chicago' was the big winner at the S.A.G. awards last night. I keep thinking I should see it, because I liked 'Moulin Rouge' and it looks sort of similar, but I can't get excited about it. Deep down I know it's different. 'Moulin Rouge' was a big grandiose mix of music styles, all of them over-the-top romantic; the whole thing was bursting at the seams with...well...freedom, beauty, truth, and love, as they claimed. Despite my cynical exterior I have an alarmingly soft spot for plush, gorgeous romanticism. Meanwhile, 'Chicago' looks sort of hard and snobbish and sophisticated. And, more to the point, I don't like jazz. I mean, I REALLY don't like it. That would surely spoil my enjoyment of 'Chicago' just a tad.
In fact, I'd like to take this space to quote a monologue Bruce McCullough once performed on "Kids in the Hall." In Bruce's usual easygoing way, he said it best:
People say, "What do you hate about poor old Jazz?"
I say, "The sound. The sound that Jazz instruments make when they're being manipulated by Jazz players to the delight of Jazz respondents. I think of it as musical barf."
They say, "I don't think you've given Jazz a chance."
Well, I maintain, I haven't given suicide a chance, but... Well, I did give suicide a chance, but that was only because I was threatened with Jazz. You know. Jazz music.
One thing I hate is being woken up in the middle of the night, when I'm dreaming about, say, promiscuity with dignity, by a rap-tap-tappin' on my window by those guys with goatee things on their faces, saying, "Hey. Can we come in? Beano's clarinet's gettin' wet." And then they go into this sorta Gene Krupa trance. Jazz, schmazz. I'm sorry; I've got to go that far. Jazz, schmazz.
True, I haven't actually seen 'Chicago.' My little sister spent twenty minutes telling me the whole plot, though. I figure that's enough. Give me back my pretty soft-hearted boys in white shirts, and keep your jazz.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:21 pm (UTC)I am also dreading Chicago, but I have to see it because Queen Latifah is in it. I keep thinking, 'well, maybe it won't be horrible, and I'll be pleasantly surprised.'
f
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:04 pm (UTC)Yeah, going in with low expectations may actually help. And Latifah has been pretty classy, in the interviews and appearances I've seen with her about it so far. She probably does a fine job.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:29 pm (UTC)Interestingly, I would never have called 'Moulin Rouge' romantic, as much as I would call it surreal, but then I like the MGM cotton candy technicolor of the 40s and 50s.
*goes off to watch 'Kiss Me Kate'*
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:50 pm (UTC)I've been reading your journal since I first stumbled across one of your LOTR parodies (which are, by the way, absolutley brilliant).
Even though we have conflicting opinons about certian issues (Jazz, for example)I love reading your journal. ;) You're a damn good writer, to start, and you seem to have a wide variety of intrests and opinons. It's nice to see such a well rounded person posting on LJ.
Just a random little note. Keep up the writing! I definitely call myself a devoted fan.
~Kat
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:07 pm (UTC)And I don't really think jazz is *all* bad. I make exceptions for nicely-performed torch songs.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 08:16 pm (UTC)I don't have any particular issues with jazz, as such, but I really really did not like Chicago. I liked Moulin Rouge, and I think you're right that the difference is that MR is all sweet and romantic and truth-freedom-beauty-love, and Chicago is nothing if not incredibly cynical and nihilistic. And... eesh. Ugh. Did not like it.
/pointlessness.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:11 pm (UTC)(As if I could get thru this without quoting LotR at some point.)
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 03:38 am (UTC)And jazz absolutely doesn't. And I couldn't care less for Chicago. I keep trying to tell me "well, they all say it's SO good so maybe you should give it a chance", but.. nah. I read the blurbs, and they don't sound like I'd like that movie. *sigh*
So hey - I'm with ya ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:13 pm (UTC)Yes, unfortunately, the movies that always win awards are seldom the movies I love best. Don't know why this is. Maybe I don't have much in common with the Hollywood elite. (Gee, there's a shocker.)
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 07:21 am (UTC)I haven't seen Chicago on film. I have seen it in London on stage - once. Not my favorite. On stage, I found it focused on the dance far more than the music or the plot. And of course, it's by Fosse, so that makes sense. There are a couple of tunes that do stay with you, and I wasn't sorry I went. I do intend to see the movie eventually.
Really, I'm just glad that musicals are making somewhat of a resurgence. It gives me hope that they might eventually film RENT.
One major difference between Moulin Rouge and Chicago is the glaring lack of a gorgeous Scottish boy. Let's have more of him. I'd see him sing in any movie.
And by the by, I'm with you. Can't stand Jazz. I will even go so far as to say that I don't understand it. I like music with a chorus or a bridge or at least a crescendo. I guess I'm pretty pedantic that way.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 09:58 am (UTC)That was our German teachers' favorite story to tell in undergrad ;)
Ich bin ein Berliner!
Date: 2003-03-11 11:24 am (UTC)Re: Ich bin ein Berliner!
Date: 2003-03-11 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:16 pm (UTC)Amen. I'd be happy - more than happy - to see Chicago if Ewan replaced Richard Gere. Just a bit biased that way...
Overall, I'm glad too that musicals are coming back. It requires actual talent to sing and dance - talent that I personally don't have, so it's all the more impressive to me when actors prove they can.
And I also love the "donut" icon. :D
no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 10:14 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-11 01:21 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-11 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 10:07 pm (UTC)I'll probably still see Chicago someday - as a rental, say - and can give a fairer comparison then.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-12 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-11 06:26 pm (UTC)re: jazz
Date: 2003-03-14 11:48 am (UTC)The vocal jazz has mostly been recieved well enough. Unless, of course, you were just humouring me. :P
Re: jazz
Date: 2003-03-14 05:48 pm (UTC)I just don't like brassy instrumentation/voices, and squealing clarinets, and yeah, that free-form nonsense. Also I think some of the stuff I dislike would go under "swing." Squirrel Nut Zippers drive me crazy (in a bad way), for instance. And Chicago looks like it contains some of that style.