Ramble on the Twilight books
Jun. 14th, 2009 10:06 amI should start by saying this ramble comes from someone who hasn't read the whole series yet. I only just started book 3 (Eclipse), and the fact that I picked it up at all after the many annoyances I found in book 2 (New Moon) is at least one compliment I can pay Stephenie Meyer. I do want to know, at least on the surface, in a soap-opera way, what happens with these characters. There's also the desire to obtain the whole picture so I can ridicule it, or at least critique it, better. I admit that. But both desires are there for me, conflicting and warring and sparkling absurdly in the sunlight. I haven't had such a bipolar reaction of being compelled to read more and wanting to smack the author and the characters every other chapter since discovering Thomas Hardy about ten years ago.
As I've recently discussed on Facebook and elsewhere with
dirae,
kenshi, and others, the "vampiric death = sex" metaphor shines glaringly clear the more you read of the Twilight series. (And it was immediately and almost hilariously obvious in the film, with Robert Pattinson using all his considerable James Dean angst to convey vampire-Edward's difficulty in keeping his hands, teeth, and other body parts off that jailbait girl-crush of his.)
But Edward's way of dealing with it is the dull, mildly religious-conservative route: abstinence only. In some ways I find it refreshing, I suppose; a book for teens that's free of sex, drugs, or swear words. On the other hand...is that really the teen life any of us knew?
When Joss Whedon introduced his teenage heroine (Buffy Summers) to a "nice" vampire (Angel), and later a not so nice one (Spike)--well, I wouldn't want to spoil it for anyone who hasn't watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer yet (which everyone should), but much more dramatic things happened. Believe me, the subtext of "vampires=sex," and the correlating "sex can equal death," rapidly became text. Buffy's interactions with Angel and Spike illustrated it loud and clear, and with about fifty times as much fascination, humor, and heartbreak as the chilly Cullens have inspired in me so far.
Anne Rice and Poppy Z. Brite veered other directions with their vampire series. Rice's vampires were, she claimed, chaste, but please; every scene was about how sensually obsessed they were with each other. Brite just went ahead and made her vampires all promiscuous lovers, having them use sex to draw in mortal victims as well. You want a really sharp, horrifying picture of the "vampire sex as death" thing, even involving teenagers, go read Brite's Lost Souls.
For that matter, going back farther, anyone over the age of about 16 who reads Bram Stoker's Dracula can clearly see the Victorian horror of female sexuality inherent in the story. Demure young women get forced to taste blood, and they turn into red-lipped, heaving-bosomed seductresses whom one must stake and decapitate as soon as possible. Yet there's a thrill in it too--everyone knows that Dracula and his she-vampires are considered sexy and alluring, at least in the lives they've taken on outside the book. Within the book itself they're not exactly painted in the most flattering terms. But the fact remains, Stoker isn't afraid to let more bad things happen to more good people than Meyer seems to be. When Stoker writes about his vampire sneaking into a young lady's bedchamber, that vampire isn't there to "watch her sleep." He's there to bite her neck, feed her his blood from his bare chest, and Make Her His.
Speaking of watching her sleep: again, anyone over about 16 who reads the Twilight books is a bit troubled by the stalker-like, semi-pedophiliac nature of Edward Cullen. For whatever reason, it hasn't occurred to young teens on the whole, but a man sneaking into your bedroom night after night, without your knowledge, just to watch you sleep, is scary, not romantic. Call the freaking cops if this is happening to you. Furthermore, we adults immediately find it weird that 100-year-old immortals would want to attend high school over and over, instead of, say, college at least. But you know who finds the scenario just perfect? High school girls, that's who. And that's part of the allure of the Twilight series as a whole: we are entirely locked into Bella's first-person, impulsive, obsessive, honest, female-adolescent point of view. Even when she annoys the hell out of me, I find it weirdly interesting to read what is, in effect, her diary. I just wonder if the books might not benefit from the point of view of an actual adult once in a while too.
(Yes, I hear Meyer's writing a new one from Edward's point of view. But he's not exactly your usual adult, so we'll see...)
On a note unrelated to sex and death, but still related to realism in the teen world, there aren't nearly enough cell phones or computers in Meyer's books. The kids mostly call each other on land lines and pass each other handwritten notes. It's almost as if...gosh, as if the author is someone my age who's remembering how things were back when she was in high school. I still don't text-message, so I feel her reluctance to fake it in fiction. On the other hand, teens are eating this series up despite the anachronism. Goes to show, there's no predicting what will fly and what will crash in the world of fandom.
All the same, vampires have been done to (sexy) death. Guess I'll have to try my hand at making Greek gods, fairy folk, ghosts, or selkies the next hip thing instead.
As I've recently discussed on Facebook and elsewhere with
But Edward's way of dealing with it is the dull, mildly religious-conservative route: abstinence only. In some ways I find it refreshing, I suppose; a book for teens that's free of sex, drugs, or swear words. On the other hand...is that really the teen life any of us knew?
When Joss Whedon introduced his teenage heroine (Buffy Summers) to a "nice" vampire (Angel), and later a not so nice one (Spike)--well, I wouldn't want to spoil it for anyone who hasn't watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer yet (which everyone should), but much more dramatic things happened. Believe me, the subtext of "vampires=sex," and the correlating "sex can equal death," rapidly became text. Buffy's interactions with Angel and Spike illustrated it loud and clear, and with about fifty times as much fascination, humor, and heartbreak as the chilly Cullens have inspired in me so far.
Anne Rice and Poppy Z. Brite veered other directions with their vampire series. Rice's vampires were, she claimed, chaste, but please; every scene was about how sensually obsessed they were with each other. Brite just went ahead and made her vampires all promiscuous lovers, having them use sex to draw in mortal victims as well. You want a really sharp, horrifying picture of the "vampire sex as death" thing, even involving teenagers, go read Brite's Lost Souls.
For that matter, going back farther, anyone over the age of about 16 who reads Bram Stoker's Dracula can clearly see the Victorian horror of female sexuality inherent in the story. Demure young women get forced to taste blood, and they turn into red-lipped, heaving-bosomed seductresses whom one must stake and decapitate as soon as possible. Yet there's a thrill in it too--everyone knows that Dracula and his she-vampires are considered sexy and alluring, at least in the lives they've taken on outside the book. Within the book itself they're not exactly painted in the most flattering terms. But the fact remains, Stoker isn't afraid to let more bad things happen to more good people than Meyer seems to be. When Stoker writes about his vampire sneaking into a young lady's bedchamber, that vampire isn't there to "watch her sleep." He's there to bite her neck, feed her his blood from his bare chest, and Make Her His.
Speaking of watching her sleep: again, anyone over about 16 who reads the Twilight books is a bit troubled by the stalker-like, semi-pedophiliac nature of Edward Cullen. For whatever reason, it hasn't occurred to young teens on the whole, but a man sneaking into your bedroom night after night, without your knowledge, just to watch you sleep, is scary, not romantic. Call the freaking cops if this is happening to you. Furthermore, we adults immediately find it weird that 100-year-old immortals would want to attend high school over and over, instead of, say, college at least. But you know who finds the scenario just perfect? High school girls, that's who. And that's part of the allure of the Twilight series as a whole: we are entirely locked into Bella's first-person, impulsive, obsessive, honest, female-adolescent point of view. Even when she annoys the hell out of me, I find it weirdly interesting to read what is, in effect, her diary. I just wonder if the books might not benefit from the point of view of an actual adult once in a while too.
(Yes, I hear Meyer's writing a new one from Edward's point of view. But he's not exactly your usual adult, so we'll see...)
On a note unrelated to sex and death, but still related to realism in the teen world, there aren't nearly enough cell phones or computers in Meyer's books. The kids mostly call each other on land lines and pass each other handwritten notes. It's almost as if...gosh, as if the author is someone my age who's remembering how things were back when she was in high school. I still don't text-message, so I feel her reluctance to fake it in fiction. On the other hand, teens are eating this series up despite the anachronism. Goes to show, there's no predicting what will fly and what will crash in the world of fandom.
All the same, vampires have been done to (sexy) death. Guess I'll have to try my hand at making Greek gods, fairy folk, ghosts, or selkies the next hip thing instead.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-14 06:04 pm (UTC)but that last point you made, about cellphones..you are SO right. ive never thought about it before! there are MANY books written post-alwaysconnected world that dont include the internet or cellphones or texting!
i guess there is something to be said for using them though...who would want to read this: ~she quickly hurried up the stairs into her room. gosh, her computer could not boot up quick enough. 'youve got mail' the browser said. 'hopefully its an email from facebook saying blain FINALLY added me on facebook' she thought to herself....~
LOLZ. i think eventually it will be added in, but it will take a long while until the concept of social networking plays out into the literary world. well...the GOOD books in the literary world...lol...i think Gossip Girl had some texting/myspace action in it...but iiidk for sure, never read them.
weird! gosh thats insane to think about! i wonder how long it took for books to include television, landline phones, cars....man!
*brain blast*
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-14 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-14 06:20 pm (UTC)I kind of like the Twilight series in an entertaining turn your brain off and read kind of way, but Meyer's book the Host is a bit better in my opinion.
New Moon is not my favourite because there's soooo much angst in it and it gets irritating. I still haven't seen the Twilight movie because I hate movie versions of books I like a lot, but the shirtless guys might make me see New Moon...
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 10:56 pm (UTC)Great Topic!
Date: 2009-06-14 07:15 pm (UTC)I loved Twilight (though partially flawed, it is an easy, fast, and intriguing read) but the series began to fall apart with New Moon. Still, I continued on, pressing forward because I wanted to know what happened to the characters...Then came Breaking Dawn AKA Breaking Fail AKA the day Twilight died. Seriously, I can't recall ever being so let down with a series.
I'm not sure if I'm ready to let go of sexy vampires just yet. I was a huge fan of Buffy. The show aired when I was in college and worked x2 jobs. It was the one night per week (New Tuesday, remember that?) I was guaranteed off. But even Sunnydale began to crumble toward the end, and I’ve yet to find an equal to the series on the boob tube since.
I think this subject meshes with another vampire/shifter/suspense series - The Anita Blake books by Laurell K. Hamilton. But while I bitch and moan over the copious amounts of needless sex and lack of plot, at least Mrs. Hamilton is honest and raw with her material. All I got from SM was the cock block, a pat on the head, and a broken heart.
Jaime
Re: Great Topic!
Date: 2009-06-15 10:58 pm (UTC)I've been well prepared for the disappointing nature of Breaking Dawn. We'll see if I bother reading it at all...
I didn't watch Buffy until a few years ago, on DVD. Which was nice in a way, because then I could see it at my own fast pace! Yes, when it was good, it was the best thing ever on TV; when it was bad, it was...well, at least it wasn' t any worse than average TV shows, I guess.
I may give Anita Blake a chance. Haven't tried her yet. Granted, there are so many vampire series out there, I could spend my whole life sampling them all and still not get through them...
Molly
no subject
Date: 2009-06-14 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 02:26 am (UTC)Amen! I felt exactly the same way (although I've now finished the books). I was curious to see how the story ended, though I was tempted to quit after Eclipse. It was Harry's CAPS LOCK OF RAGE from a teenage girl's point of view. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 04:30 am (UTC)Have you read Robin McKinley's Sunlight? Great vampire book, from a woman's perspective but keeping a touch of the vampire sexuality. Definitely my favorite vampire novel, though admittedly I haven't read too many of them.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:03 pm (UTC)There are too many vampire books to keep up with, but I like to sample one every few months/years just to stay in touch...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 06:19 am (UTC)Of course, this was five years ago, so they might have more towers there now.
But the rest of your reactions, I'm right there with you. And if you think Meyer is bad at letting bad things happen to her characters now, just wait until Breaking Dawn...
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:04 pm (UTC)I have yet to hear of anyone who really loved Breaking Dawn. Heh. Must be one hell of a letdown.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 02:11 pm (UTC)Like other folks, I'm wondering if you have read other vampire novels. I've not read many, but Barbara Hambly's Those Who Hunt the Night was an interesting read, if only because it turned Stoker on its head by saying that vampires have no sexual desire, and managed to give a credible reason why. The second book needed a better editor, but was also an interesting read.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 09:29 pm (UTC)I'm actually OK with the low-tech; if you want your books not to become instantly dated, you want to avoid including too much datable content. This is especially true of YA books: The first Gulf War is as ancient to the average Twilight reader as the Peloponnesian War. No references to current pop songs: Pink and Lady Gaga are tomorrow's Herman's Hermits. And texting may be next year's CB radio. I think this is why good High Fantasy outlives good SF: Lord of the Rings is no more anachronistic now than it was in the 1950s, while Asimov and Heinlein have been overtaken by reality.
Besides, Forks is kind of way out in the sticks of the Olympic Peninsula -- we urban snobs are willing to assign it any amount of backwardness, however unjustly.
I'm not going to say anything at all about Anita Blake. Well, nothing but this: http://www.kitwhitfield.com/2006/09/mary-sue-gets-mean.html.
But I think vampires never get old, so to speak. After Anne Rice I thought I'd never want to hear the word "vampire" again -- until Buffy came along. Now I have a colleague who's pressuring me to watch True Blood. Vampires are Sex and Death/Life, with Blood linking them... as long as humanity is mortal, there will be a market for vampire stories.
The Greek gods (Percy Jackson?), the Fair Folk, and the rest of folklore have been mined pretty deeply, too, but that's OK. Can I go down on record saying I don't like selkies? I just don't.
But I do like the way you do ghosts.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 11:13 pm (UTC)Hmm, sounds like Anita might not be much fun to read. I may give that a pass.
I go back and forth with the here-and-now technology and pop references. True, they get more dated more quickly...but would films like Pretty in Pink be half so charming now if they didn't have those cute '80s-isms? Like Andrew McCarthy tapping a bunch of computer keys from his machine and making a photo appear on Molly Ringwald's screen? (Or the notion that the horrid pink prom dress was actually attractive?) Similarly, we all learned from War Games that you could accidentally declare war on Russia with your computer if you messed around too much. Gotta be careful with that stuff.
But you're right: SF becomes cute eventually, at best, rather than staying relevant for long. Look how amusing Disneyland's Tomorrowland area was. The '50s anticipating the year 2000, and getting it all grandly (though optimistically) wrong...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-16 05:39 pm (UTC)After I finished Twilight my first reaction was that had I read it as a teen I might have enjoyed it, but from my adult perspective much of it annoyed me. Since I have read other young adult novels without that reaction, in my view it goes back to Meyer's skills as a writer.
Furthermore, we adults immediately find it weird that 100-year-old immortals would want to attend high school over and over, instead of, say, college at least.
So true. And how weird that it's not only Edward attending high school again and again but his "brothers and sister", too!
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 11:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 02:20 am (UTC)i'd support that
no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 02:17 am (UTC)This way she can still hold her head up in her LDS ward, to say nothing of selling the books to a gazillion Mormon teenagers.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-20 04:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 05:10 pm (UTC)And the book is geared towards teenagers. Yeah, so was Harry Potter, and honestly JK Rowling approached some more adult behaviour in her books. There was a LOT of dark stuff in the HP series ... vampires are dark, having someone try to kill you and stalking you across the country is plenty dark, don't get me wrong ... but at least for the first three books of Stephenie Meyer's series, it's fluffy.
I'll refrain from mentioning any plot details of Breaking Dawn ... but OMG it gets slightly more adult there. Seriously.
But hey ... altho vampires have been done to sexy death ... bring it on! I luvs me some vamp action! LOL
no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 05:22 pm (UTC)Another series with vamps galore (and lots of Greek pantheon action, and dragons, and shifters) is the Dark Hunter series by Sherrilyn Kenyon. It gets to be light/fluffy/vampire bodice ripper at times, but if you go into it fully acknowledging that you are reading a paranormal ROMANCE, then you won't be shocked. Not everyone writes romance with as much plot and storyline and character development as you do, hon. But if you want a steamy vampire read, the DH books give you plenty of swoon material. Acheron on his own is swoon-worthy. And he's the only character in the entire series that is given any character development. But for fast paced smut, the DH books are good.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-06-20 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-20 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 08:04 am (UTC)http://soloreader18.livejournal.com/11605.html
no subject
Date: 2009-07-18 09:54 pm (UTC)