End of 'Angel', and other Buffyverse links
Oct. 8th, 2007 09:42 pm(Welcome, all those whom I dragged over here from
mollyringwraith! Here's some of the promised discussion...)
I'm finally done watching every episode of Angel, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Firefly, so aside from the comic books and upcoming projects, I can no longer be spoiled on anything Joss Whedon has done. And I am most definitely a devoted Buffyverse fangirl who will, one of these months, go back and acquire it all on DVD and watch it all again.
Which is not to say that the last moments of Angel didn't irritate me at first. I mean, you call that an ending? I'm more inclined to call it "ran out of time and was mad at being canceled so decided to leave things in a tangle." But after some thought, I've accepted it. The ambiguity fits the moral ambiguities of the show all along. Anyway, clearly Spike, Angel, Lorne, and Illyria all survive. Gunn, probably not. Wesley: *sniffle*! I'll miss him in the comic books. But at this point killing him was basically a way of putting him out of his misery, so maybe it's for the best.
Anyway, then we went back and re-watched the "Spike fights puppet Angel" bit from "Smile Time," which my husband hadn't seen, and he laughed harder than I've seen him laugh at anything in weeks, so this season has redeemed itself. Truly it was a great season overall, and I'm bummed they got cancelled when they did. I hear they really were planning to bring Oz back for season 6! Dang it. Oh well, maybe those comics...
So, a couple good essays by writer Jennifer Crusie here:
Dating Death, detailing why romance writers love watching BtVS, particularly the Spike/Buffy dynamic
The Assassination of Cordelia Chase, on how the show's writers screwed up with Cordy's character.
Major spoilers for both of those, which I can now read! Hoorah.
And a funny cartoon about the end of "Buffy", again with spoilers: http://archive.gamespy.com/comics/dorktower/images/comics/dorktower256.jpg
So. Dang. Guess I'll decompress with some movies for a week or so, then launch into the new "Dr Who" and see how I like it.
In the meantime...one of those new Buffy comics, I hear, features a nice dream sequence picture of Buffy lounging in bed with Spike and Angel on either side of her. I don't suppose anyone has scanned that so I can stare at it lasciviously? Or do I have to wait till I get my own copy?
:)
I'm finally done watching every episode of Angel, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Firefly, so aside from the comic books and upcoming projects, I can no longer be spoiled on anything Joss Whedon has done. And I am most definitely a devoted Buffyverse fangirl who will, one of these months, go back and acquire it all on DVD and watch it all again.
Which is not to say that the last moments of Angel didn't irritate me at first. I mean, you call that an ending? I'm more inclined to call it "ran out of time and was mad at being canceled so decided to leave things in a tangle." But after some thought, I've accepted it. The ambiguity fits the moral ambiguities of the show all along. Anyway, clearly Spike, Angel, Lorne, and Illyria all survive. Gunn, probably not. Wesley: *sniffle*! I'll miss him in the comic books. But at this point killing him was basically a way of putting him out of his misery, so maybe it's for the best.
Anyway, then we went back and re-watched the "Spike fights puppet Angel" bit from "Smile Time," which my husband hadn't seen, and he laughed harder than I've seen him laugh at anything in weeks, so this season has redeemed itself. Truly it was a great season overall, and I'm bummed they got cancelled when they did. I hear they really were planning to bring Oz back for season 6! Dang it. Oh well, maybe those comics...
So, a couple good essays by writer Jennifer Crusie here:
Dating Death, detailing why romance writers love watching BtVS, particularly the Spike/Buffy dynamic
The Assassination of Cordelia Chase, on how the show's writers screwed up with Cordy's character.
Major spoilers for both of those, which I can now read! Hoorah.
And a funny cartoon about the end of "Buffy", again with spoilers: http://archive.gamespy.com/comics/dorktower/images/comics/dorktower256.jpg
So. Dang. Guess I'll decompress with some movies for a week or so, then launch into the new "Dr Who" and see how I like it.
In the meantime...one of those new Buffy comics, I hear, features a nice dream sequence picture of Buffy lounging in bed with Spike and Angel on either side of her. I don't suppose anyone has scanned that so I can stare at it lasciviously? Or do I have to wait till I get my own copy?
:)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:47 pm (UTC)If only *I* ever influenced anyone to watch anything...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 08:54 pm (UTC)Just because I think David Tennant has *IT* does not mean I *squee*... he leaves me conflicted given my totally non-sexualized past with Doctor Who. :P
You better fancy it or we are going to take your pervy card away.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:25 pm (UTC)I suspect I'll like Tennant even if the Eccleston series doesn't grab me. I've seen Tennant in one or two other things, and really liked his goofy qualities. If he turns it toward pervy as well, I will likely get hooked. (And hey, from the link
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 05:03 am (UTC)Angel is about being an adult, and that shit never ends.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:49 pm (UTC)And, hah, I finally understand your icon. Awesome.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:23 pm (UTC)I still occasionally break that one out to re-watch it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 07:36 am (UTC)can i quote you on my userinfo?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:24 am (UTC)I get the Buffy comic (read the latest issue last night), and I think I'd remember that dream... If it turns up in a future issue, I'll happily scan it for you!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:13 pm (UTC)*maniacal grin of glee*
It will consume you. Seriously, you're exactly following my path of DVD watching, except about 9 months behind. It's fascinating.
And lesson the first about Doctor Who....The title of the show is written "Doctor Who" and the character is known as "the Doctor."
/nitpicking
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:54 pm (UTC)I know the show technically spells it out "Doctor," but, what, I can't use "Dr" as an abbreviation? Was it wrong for me to write "Lord of the Rings" (or LOTR) when the full title is "THE Lord of the Rings" (TLOTR)? ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 08:56 pm (UTC)Oy. Fandom.
*Shakes Head and wonders off.*
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 09:51 pm (UTC)What!? You want to ABBREVIATE the title of the sacred "Doctor Who"? Don't you realize that by simply using "Dr," that it compromises the integrity and sanctity of the show!?
Watching "Doctor Who" comes with a lot of responsibilities...and if you don't think you're going to be able handle them, then maybe you should just watch "Journeyman."
Newbie :P
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 10:32 pm (UTC)Right, sir. Sorry, sir.
Ahh, as the saying goes, "Fandom is fucking funny," and we must never let fandom itself forget it. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 11:50 pm (UTC)That hubby of mine is too cute for his own good.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 09:10 pm (UTC)[While I am at it, I think Ecceleston's Doctor was listed as "Doctor Who" in the credits.]
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 11:17 pm (UTC)Yes, he was, and David Tennant made them change it to "The Doctor" to be more correct. If we're talking arcane bits of knowledge.
I second your "Oy, Fandom" and headshake.
I forgot to put in the standard disclaimer: This message is intended as friendly conversation and should not be taken too seriously. This means you, Who fandom.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 11:47 pm (UTC)I loathe the know-it-all quality of fandom. Lemonlye and I have been in a few "fandoms" together since the mid-1990s and have dealt with various levels of in-fighting. Such "facts" as the one you presented come across as snarky on the internet because the ability to read one's tone is non-existent unless coded to show intent.
Many people get their thrills by belittling "newbies". It ends up being a turn off for many people who are experiencing something for the first time.
I think Morrissey unintentionally summed up fandom when he wrote, "There is always someone somewhere with a big nose who knows and trips you up and laughs when you fall."
no subject
Date: 2007-10-11 12:46 am (UTC)I figure I'll have a lot of fun with this issue, too...might have to call him "Il Dottore" just to be annoying for one or two posts. :D