F'Nancing and other sports
Feb. 22nd, 2005 12:58 pm[Poll #442359]
I ask because lately, out here in the West, I've heard an increase in the number of commercials that advertise "3.5% f'-NAN-sing." Didn't we used to say "FY-nancing"? You know, like "finance" with an "ing" at the end, which is, curiously, the word we're pronouncing here? (And none of you pronounce it "fi-NANCE," right? Or...do you?)
I have a totally unfounded linguistic theory that the reason people in advertisement voice-overs are now saying "fih-NAN-sing" is that they think it sounds fancier and less Texan/Southern/Western. Texan/Southern/Western American dialects tend to have syllable-initial stress on words that do not have syllable-initial stress in other English dialects. (Some friends of mine were in stitches over a Texan gal referring to the "BAL-lay" [ballet] rather than our Frenchified "bal-LAY".) My unfounded linguistic theory suggests that people do not want to sound anything remotely like a Texan or Southerner, for stereotyped and stupid reasons. Only, as a linguist, I couldn't call them stupid for their reasoning and maintain my academic objectivity. I would, however, secretly think it a very stupid motivation for changing one's pronunciation.
Now, if you've always pronounced it "fih-NAN-sing," then that's another matter. And I'm curious if such is the case.
I ask because lately, out here in the West, I've heard an increase in the number of commercials that advertise "3.5% f'-NAN-sing." Didn't we used to say "FY-nancing"? You know, like "finance" with an "ing" at the end, which is, curiously, the word we're pronouncing here? (And none of you pronounce it "fi-NANCE," right? Or...do you?)
I have a totally unfounded linguistic theory that the reason people in advertisement voice-overs are now saying "fih-NAN-sing" is that they think it sounds fancier and less Texan/Southern/Western. Texan/Southern/Western American dialects tend to have syllable-initial stress on words that do not have syllable-initial stress in other English dialects. (Some friends of mine were in stitches over a Texan gal referring to the "BAL-lay" [ballet] rather than our Frenchified "bal-LAY".) My unfounded linguistic theory suggests that people do not want to sound anything remotely like a Texan or Southerner, for stereotyped and stupid reasons. Only, as a linguist, I couldn't call them stupid for their reasoning and maintain my academic objectivity. I would, however, secretly think it a very stupid motivation for changing one's pronunciation.
Now, if you've always pronounced it "fih-NAN-sing," then that's another matter. And I'm curious if such is the case.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 02:08 pm (UTC)~A
no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 04:10 pm (UTC)Switch
(Who apparently still speaks with a Wyoming accent intermixed with her Pac NW accent.)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 05:23 pm (UTC)Did somebody call for a LINGUIST?
:D
There is indeed a connection: much of Appalachia, or what we might call hillbilly territory, was settled by the Scots-Irish (i.e., people of Scottish ancestry who fled to Ireland and then to America after another generation or two). Because those mountains are fairly remote, the dialect evolved without a lot of influence from other styles of speech. Of course, elsewhere in the South, in places like Virginia, there were a lot of English colonists, and their speech (which was probably lower-class Elizabethan English in the early colonial days) played a part in the Southern accent as we know it, too. That's the really short version.
Also, the importance of whiskey in both Ireland and Appalachia cannot be overlooked as a clear cultural connection. Hee.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 10:04 pm (UTC)Dead languages? Yep! Deader than dead. The only way these languages still survive on the tongues of the living are folks like me who insist on figuring out their history.
But thank you for enlightening me on Appalachian speech patterns. I'm sure whiskey had a lot to do with it.
Switch
no subject
Date: 2005-02-23 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 05:26 pm (UTC)But, yes, there are British dialect roots in many of the Southern U.S. dialects. See my reply below to
no subject
Date: 2005-02-22 11:02 pm (UTC)Funny enough, I still hear it 'FY-nan-sing'. Except from my English teacher, who is from New York (run away!)
That's just strange...
Proud Northeasterner
Date: 2005-02-23 05:10 am (UTC)Re: Proud Northeasterner
Date: 2005-02-23 01:17 pm (UTC)-Molly, from Oregon, near the Wil-LAM-mette, not WILL-a-mette, River. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-23 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-23 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-26 10:47 am (UTC)