It's not The Onion, nor even Fanfiction.net:
"Rowling says that she should have put Hermione and Harry together in the Harry Potter series instead of Hermione and Ron.
“I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment,” she says. “That’s how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron.”
“I know, I’m sorry,” she continued, “I can hear the rage and fury it might cause some fans, but if I’m absolutely honest, distance has given me perspective on that. It was a choice I made for very personal reasons, not for reasons of credibility. Am I breaking people’s hearts by saying this? I hope not.”
---
I wouldn't say Harry/Hermione are the ideal couple, but they did have rather more chemistry and a better personality match than either Harry/Ginny or Hermione/Ron, so...fine with me! Going to be fun to watch fandom go completely insane for a little while.
In any case: What a book means to the reader is what it means to the reader, and nothing can change that. And she's not revising and reissuing the books, so it's not Lucas levels of messing with stuff. I find it interesting to hear what the author thinks of the series with her hindsight, but we can all go right on shipping whoever we like--Hermione/Snape, Luna/Harry, anything at all. Tolkien never admitted Frodo and Sam were in love, but I'll always know it's so.
"Rowling says that she should have put Hermione and Harry together in the Harry Potter series instead of Hermione and Ron.
“I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment,” she says. “That’s how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron.”
“I know, I’m sorry,” she continued, “I can hear the rage and fury it might cause some fans, but if I’m absolutely honest, distance has given me perspective on that. It was a choice I made for very personal reasons, not for reasons of credibility. Am I breaking people’s hearts by saying this? I hope not.”
---
I wouldn't say Harry/Hermione are the ideal couple, but they did have rather more chemistry and a better personality match than either Harry/Ginny or Hermione/Ron, so...fine with me! Going to be fun to watch fandom go completely insane for a little while.
In any case: What a book means to the reader is what it means to the reader, and nothing can change that. And she's not revising and reissuing the books, so it's not Lucas levels of messing with stuff. I find it interesting to hear what the author thinks of the series with her hindsight, but we can all go right on shipping whoever we like--Hermione/Snape, Luna/Harry, anything at all. Tolkien never admitted Frodo and Sam were in love, but I'll always know it's so.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-02 04:40 am (UTC)But yes, I always love hearing authors' after-the-fact stories, particularly what they'd change if they could go back, because I am so bad for changing my mind about something halfway through a story and then debating which version is better.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-02 04:47 am (UTC)This isn't the first time she's done this -- remember how she oh-so-casually let us know Dumbledore was gay? And I still don't buy that a kid could be treated like he's nonexistent and worthless for the first 11 years of his life and still be that well-adjusted. From a writer's perspective, it is nice to hear how she decided what would be left out, what she changed or wishes she'd changed. From a reader's perspective, I'm still going to read those books again someday and enjoy them.
But now Ron and Hermione's tension will seem even more clunky and awkward than before, now that I know even the author was forcing herself to write it.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-02 06:28 am (UTC)i always thought that the movies seemed to be more harry/hermione.
Going to be fun to watch fandom go completely insane for a little while.
i read harry, a history by the webmistress of the leaky cauldron, melissa anelli & she talks about the shipping wars between the harry/hermione & the ron/hermione supporters. so i'm sure there are people going apes#!t as we speak. or type, rather.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-02 04:36 pm (UTC)So if Ron ended up weak, it's because he really didn't have a terrific role to play in the books. He was always there to either support or stress Harry as the situation required. Again, hard to cheer for that.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-03 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 12:01 am (UTC)I do sympathize with her for having conflicting later thoughts. I do the same with my stories. She's got to know what kind of craziness it'll provoke to speak them, though, so I wonder if she has a sadistic streak. ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 12:05 am (UTC)But agreed on the unnecessariness (and mostly unsatisfyingness) of the epilogue. "Happy for now" is more realistic and just as satisfying for me, when it comes to teens in fiction. Not many of us end up marrying the person we were dating at 17. OK, I did, but most don't. :D
no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-04 07:07 pm (UTC)