Scary adventures in books
Nov. 12th, 2006 04:58 pmAll right, everyone, I'm going to do it. It may be reckless, it may be painful, but I'm determined. I have knocked it long enough without trying it, so now I'm going to try it, and I won't be stopped.
I'm going to read a Danielle Steel novel.
Pray for me. Maybe I'll soon be back to report that someone's loins are being struck with the hammer of desire. Here's hoping.
The book I just finished caused me to invoke my rare "Do not read after dark" rule: The Haunting of Hill House by (I almost wrote "Danielle Steel") Shirley Jackson. Brilliant if weird, and very very spooky without actually showing any ghosts. But we all know it's what you can't see that's scary. And, in the end, it was actually more interesting than frightening, so a well-done story overall.
I'm going to read a Danielle Steel novel.
Pray for me. Maybe I'll soon be back to report that someone's loins are being struck with the hammer of desire. Here's hoping.
The book I just finished caused me to invoke my rare "Do not read after dark" rule: The Haunting of Hill House by (I almost wrote "Danielle Steel") Shirley Jackson. Brilliant if weird, and very very spooky without actually showing any ghosts. But we all know it's what you can't see that's scary. And, in the end, it was actually more interesting than frightening, so a well-done story overall.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 09:12 am (UTC)Which one are you reading? You should categorize as you read:
Number of various penile references:
Number of body parts afire:
Number of cliched phrases:
Number of times you laughed at inappropriate times:
And so on and so forth...
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 02:08 pm (UTC)And the sentence fragments. Were very irritating.
You may learn how NOT to write, but that's about it.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:53 pm (UTC)Your checklist--heheh! So far I would already be in the "several dozen" range for cliched phrases, but otherwise it isn't the worst-written thing I ever saw. We'll see when the action gets hot & heavy.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:57 pm (UTC)Also, a writing how-to book I recently read explained that you shouldn't start in with an interesting move made by the protagonist, then have him look out the window for a while as you go into 20 pages of backstory. Which, pretty much literally, is what she's doing in this one. (Guy gets on plane to move to another country after nasty divorce, and uses length of flight to dwell on entire relationship over many many pages.)
I will indeed try to keep it from influencing me, except in the sense of figuring out how she sells so damn many books!
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 05:02 pm (UTC)Oh, and the desire/loins bit was inspired by an actual quote from a romance novel I read (for some reason) earlier this year. Think it was "Desire slammed into his loins like a fist." Ow! Jeez!
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 06:38 pm (UTC)That's just....EEEW...ick.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 10:57 pm (UTC)I love Jackson, and Haunting is (in my opinion) one of her best. I recommend the old black-and-white move based on the book (called simply "The Haunting"). There's a more recent film version with Catherine Zeta-Jones and Liam Neeson in it, but it bears just a passing resemblance to the book and is not nearly so well-crafted, though the special effects are quite something. Another book of hers that has a similar (if more subtle) narrator/main character is We Have Always Lived in the Castle (Mr. Bill's favorite Jackson novel so far).
A Jackson book I think you'd really dig: The Bird's Nest. It's about a woman with multiple personalities and is quite a compelling read, while not being nearly so disturbing as Haunting (though Bird's Nest does have its disturbing moments, too). I can't really say any more about why I like it so much because it's all spoilery, but I highly recommend it.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 11:53 pm (UTC)Anyway, cool: must wish-list more Shirley Jackson!